no. (roses_rejoice) wrote in supreme_court,
no.
roses_rejoice
supreme_court

thoughts on Raich anyone?

i found that extremely unsurprising, except for the oddness of having Thomas and Rehnquist on the "pro-pot" side (but given that the case wasn't really about pot, that wasn't so awfully weird). was anyone else surprised or did it seem obvious to you all as well?
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
  • 2 comments